DEVELOPMENT... OpenML
Data
sensory

sensory

active ARFF Publicly available Visibility: public Uploaded 29-09-2014 by unknown
0 likes downloaded by 0 people , 0 total downloads 0 issues 0 downvotes
Issue #Downvotes for this reason By


Loading wiki
Help us complete this description Edit
Author: Source: Unknown - Date unknown Please cite: Data for the sensory evaluation experiment in Brien, C.J. and Payne, R.W. (1996) Tiers, structure formulae and the analysis of complicated experiments. submitted for publication. The experiment involved two phases. In the field phase a viticultural experiment was conducted to investigate the differences between 4 types of trellising and 2 methods of pruning. The design was a split-plot design in which the trellis types were assigned to the main plots using two adjacent Youden squares of 3 rows and 4 columns. Each main plot was split into two subplots (or halfplots) and the methods of pruning assigned at random independently to the two halfplots in each main plot. The produce of each halfplot was made into a wine so that there were 24 wines altogether. The second phase was an evaluation phase in which the produce from the halplots was evaluated by 6 judges all of whom took part in 24 sittings. In the first 12 sittings the judges evaluated the wines made from the halfplots of one square; the final 12 sittings were to evaluate the wines from the other square. At each sitting, each judge assessed two glasses of wine from each of the halplots of one of the main plots. The main plots allocated to the judges at each sitting were determined as follows. For the allocation of rows, each occasion was subdivided into 3 intervals of 4 consecutive sittings. During each interval, each judge examined plots from one particular row, these being determined using two 3x3 Latin squares for each occasion, one for judges 1-3 and the other for judges 4-6. At each sitting judges 1-3 examined wines from one particular column and judges 4-6 examined wines from another column. The columns were randomized to the 2 sets of judges x 3 intervals x 4 sittings using duplicates of a balanced incomplete block design for v=4 and k=2 that were latinized. This balanced incomplete block design consists of three sets of 2 blocks, each set containing the 4 "treatments". For each interval, a different set of 2 blocks was taken and each block assigned to two sittings, but with the columns within the block placed in reverse order in one sitting compared to the other sitting. Thus, in each interval, a judge would evaluate a wine from each of the 4 columns. The scores assigned in evaluating the wines, and the factors indexing them, are given below. The factors are as follows: Occasion Judges Interval Sittings Position Squares Rows Columns Halfplot Trellis Method followed by the response variable Score The scores are ordered so that the factors Occasion, Judges, Interval, Sittings and Position are in standard order; the remaining factors are in randomized order. Information about the dataset CLASSTYPE: numeric CLASSINDEX: last

12 features

Score (target)numeric11 unique values
0 missing
Occasionnominal2 unique values
0 missing
Judgesnominal6 unique values
0 missing
Intervalnominal3 unique values
0 missing
Sittingsnominal4 unique values
0 missing
Positionnominal4 unique values
0 missing
Squaresnominal2 unique values
0 missing
Rowsnominal3 unique values
0 missing
Columnsnominal4 unique values
0 missing
Halfplotnominal2 unique values
0 missing
Trellisnominal4 unique values
0 missing
Methodnominal2 unique values
0 missing

107 properties

576
Number of instances (rows) of the dataset.
12
Number of attributes (columns) of the dataset.
0
Number of distinct values of the target attribute (if it is nominal).
0
Number of missing values in the dataset.
0
Number of instances with at least one value missing.
1
Number of numeric attributes.
11
Number of nominal attributes.
0.28
Average class difference between consecutive instances.
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
Entropy of the target attribute values.
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump
0.02
Number of attributes divided by the number of instances.
Number of attributes needed to optimally describe the class (under the assumption of independence among attributes). Equals ClassEntropy divided by MeanMutualInformation.
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .00001
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .00001
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .00001
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .0001
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .0001
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .0001
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .001
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .001
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .001
Percentage of instances belonging to the most frequent class.
Number of instances belonging to the most frequent class.
Maximum entropy among attributes.
0.07
Maximum kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
15.07
Maximum of means among attributes of the numeric type.
Maximum mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
6
The maximum number of distinct values among attributes of the nominal type.
-0.04
Maximum skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
0.82
Maximum standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
Average entropy of the attributes.
0.07
Mean kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
15.07
Mean of means among attributes of the numeric type.
Average mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
An estimate of the amount of irrelevant information in the attributes regarding the class. Equals (MeanAttributeEntropy - MeanMutualInformation) divided by MeanMutualInformation.
3.27
Average number of distinct values among the attributes of the nominal type.
-0.04
Mean skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
0.82
Mean standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
Minimal entropy among attributes.
0.07
Minimum kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
15.07
Minimum of means among attributes of the numeric type.
Minimal mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
2
The minimal number of distinct values among attributes of the nominal type.
-0.04
Minimum skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
0.82
Minimum standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
Percentage of instances belonging to the least frequent class.
Number of instances belonging to the least frequent class.
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes
4
Number of binary attributes.
33.33
Percentage of binary attributes.
0
Percentage of instances having missing values.
0
Percentage of missing values.
8.33
Percentage of numeric attributes.
91.67
Percentage of nominal attributes.
First quartile of entropy among attributes.
0.07
First quartile of kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
15.07
First quartile of means among attributes of the numeric type.
First quartile of mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
-0.04
First quartile of skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
0.82
First quartile of standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
Second quartile (Median) of entropy among attributes.
0.07
Second quartile (Median) of kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
15.07
Second quartile (Median) of means among attributes of the numeric type.
Second quartile (Median) of mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
-0.04
Second quartile (Median) of skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
0.82
Second quartile (Median) of standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
Third quartile of entropy among attributes.
0.07
Third quartile of kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
15.07
Third quartile of means among attributes of the numeric type.
Third quartile of mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
-0.04
Third quartile of skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
0.82
Third quartile of standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 1
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 1
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 1
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 2
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 2
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 2
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 3
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 3
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 3
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 1
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 1
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 1
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 2
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 2
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 2
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 3
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 3
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 3
1.27
Standard deviation of the number of distinct values among attributes of the nominal type.
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk

15 tasks

3 runs - estimation_procedure: 10-fold Crossvalidation - evaluation_measure: root_mean_squared_error - target_feature: Score
2 runs - estimation_procedure: 10-fold Crossvalidation - evaluation_measure: mean_absolute_error - target_feature: Score
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 10 times 10-fold Crossvalidation - evaluation_measure: mean_absolute_error - target_feature: Score
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 33% Holdout set - target_feature: Score
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
Define a new task