DEVELOPMENT... OpenML
Data
fl2000

fl2000

active ARFF Publicly available Visibility: public Uploaded 28-09-2014 by Felicia West
0 likes downloaded by 4 people , 5 total downloads 0 issues 0 downvotes
Issue #Downvotes for this reason By


Loading wiki
Help us complete this description Edit
Author: Source: Unknown - Date unknown Please cite: County data from the 2000 Presidential Election in Florida. Compiled by Brett Presnell Department of Statistics, University of Florida These data are derived from three sources, described below. As far as I am aware, you are free to use these data in any way that you see fit, though some acknowledgement is always nice. The candidate vote counts are the final certified counts reported by the Florida Division of Elections. These were obtained from the NORC web site in the file Cert_results.csv. Note that these do NOT inculde the federal absentee votes (so that Gore's total vote is actually higher here than Bush's). The undervote and overvote counts were extracted from the NORC ballot level data in the file aligned.txt. Since aligned.txt is too large to work with in R (or almost any other program) I used cut (a standard UNIX program) to extract just the columns I needed: cut -f 2,9,10 -d"|" aligned.txt > tmp Then I read the results into R and processed them there. The technology and columns data were extracted from the Media Group data from the NORC web site. "Technology" is simply the type of voting machine used, and "columns" is 1 if the ballot listed the presidential candidates in a single column on a single page, and 2 if the presidential candidates were spread over two columns or two pages of the ballot. These agree with some earlier data that I had obtained from the NY Times web site, except that in the media group data the PalmBeach county ballot (the famous butterfly ballot) was listed as having one column. I would definitely call this a two-column ballot, so that is the designation recorded here. At one time I thought that MiamiDade County also used a two-column ballot, but I was wrong (the ballot listed the candidates and parties in English and Spanish in opposing columns). Images of most of the ballots can be found on the New York Times web site: www.nytimes.com/images/2001/11/12/politics/recount/index_BALLOT.html Information about the dataset CLASSTYPE: nominal CLASSINDEX: 2

16 features

technology (target)nominal5 unique values
0 missing
McCarthynumeric3 unique values
0 missing
county (ignore)nominal67 unique values
0 missing
Chotenumeric6 unique values
0 missing
Mooreheadnumeric41 unique values
0 missing
Phillipsnumeric31 unique values
0 missing
McReynoldsnumeric18 unique values
0 missing
Buchanannumeric61 unique values
0 missing
Hagelinnumeric36 unique values
0 missing
Harrisnumeric22 unique values
0 missing
Nadernumeric66 unique values
0 missing
Brownenumeric57 unique values
0 missing
Gorenumeric67 unique values
0 missing
Bushnumeric67 unique values
0 missing
overnumeric65 unique values
0 missing
undernumeric60 unique values
0 missing
columnsnominal2 unique values
0 missing

107 properties

67
Number of instances (rows) of the dataset.
16
Number of attributes (columns) of the dataset.
5
Number of distinct values of the target attribute (if it is nominal).
0
Number of missing values in the dataset.
0
Number of instances with at least one value missing.
14
Number of numeric attributes.
2
Number of nominal attributes.
0.44
Average class difference between consecutive instances.
0.76
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
0.24
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
0.55
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
0.76
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
0.24
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
0.55
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
0.76
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
0.24
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
0.55
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk -E "weka.attributeSelection.CfsSubsetEval -P 1 -E 1" -S "weka.attributeSelection.BestFirst -D 1 -N 5" -W
1.49
Entropy of the target attribute values.
0.74
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump
0.24
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump
0.51
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.DecisionStump
0.24
Number of attributes divided by the number of instances.
23.23
Number of attributes needed to optimally describe the class (under the assumption of independence among attributes). Equals ClassEntropy divided by MeanMutualInformation.
0.65
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .00001
0.27
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .00001
0.45
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .00001
0.65
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .0001
0.27
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .0001
0.45
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .0001
0.65
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .001
0.27
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .001
0.45
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.J48 -C .001
61.19
Percentage of instances belonging to the most frequent class.
41
Number of instances belonging to the most frequent class.
0.86
Maximum entropy among attributes.
61.16
Maximum kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
43453.99
Maximum of means among attributes of the numeric type.
0.06
Maximum mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
5
The maximum number of distinct values among attributes of the nominal type.
7.68
Maximum skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
75070.44
Maximum standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
0.86
Average entropy of the attributes.
19.53
Mean kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
6541.18
Mean of means among attributes of the numeric type.
0.06
Average mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
12.44
An estimate of the amount of irrelevant information in the attributes regarding the class. Equals (MeanAttributeEntropy - MeanMutualInformation) divided by MeanMutualInformation.
3.5
Average number of distinct values among the attributes of the nominal type.
3.85
Mean skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
10102.95
Mean standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
0.86
Minimal entropy among attributes.
2.27
Minimum kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
0.09
Minimum of means among attributes of the numeric type.
0.06
Minimal mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
2
The minimal number of distinct values among attributes of the nominal type.
1.71
Minimum skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
0.42
Minimum standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
1.49
Percentage of instances belonging to the least frequent class.
1
Number of instances belonging to the least frequent class.
0.81
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes
0.36
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes
0.43
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes
1
Number of binary attributes.
6.25
Percentage of binary attributes.
0
Percentage of instances having missing values.
0
Percentage of missing values.
87.5
Percentage of numeric attributes.
12.5
Percentage of nominal attributes.
0.86
First quartile of entropy among attributes.
5.12
First quartile of kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
9.05
First quartile of means among attributes of the numeric type.
0.06
First quartile of mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
2.2
First quartile of skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
26.93
First quartile of standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
0.86
Second quartile (Median) of entropy among attributes.
13.12
Second quartile (Median) of kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
139.46
Second quartile (Median) of means among attributes of the numeric type.
0.06
Second quartile (Median) of mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
3.35
Second quartile (Median) of skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
190.64
Second quartile (Median) of standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
0.86
Third quartile of entropy among attributes.
35.87
Third quartile of kurtosis among attributes of the numeric type.
1515.29
Third quartile of means among attributes of the numeric type.
0.06
Third quartile of mutual information between the nominal attributes and the target attribute.
5.53
Third quartile of skewness among attributes of the numeric type.
2582.39
Third quartile of standard deviation of attributes of the numeric type.
0.79
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 1
0.27
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 1
0.52
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 1
0.79
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 2
0.27
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 2
0.52
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 2
0.79
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 3
0.27
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 3
0.52
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.REPTree -L 3
0.68
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 1
0.34
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 1
0.38
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 1
0.68
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 2
0.34
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 2
0.38
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 2
0.68
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 3
0.34
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 3
0.38
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.trees.RandomTree -depth 3
2.12
Standard deviation of the number of distinct values among attributes of the nominal type.
0.76
Area Under the ROC Curve achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk
0.22
Error rate achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk
0.58
Kappa coefficient achieved by the landmarker weka.classifiers.lazy.IBk

14 tasks

32 runs - estimation_procedure: 10-fold Crossvalidation - evaluation_measure: predictive_accuracy - target_feature: technology
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 10 times 10-fold Crossvalidation - evaluation_measure: predictive_accuracy - target_feature: technology
0 runs - estimation_procedure: Interleaved Test then Train - target_feature: technology
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
0 runs - estimation_procedure: 50 times Clustering
Define a new task